Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 October 20

< October 19	October 21 >

October 20

File:WellsFargoNorfolk.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:WellsFargoNorfolk.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is part of a series of hundreds of likely copyvios uploaded by a series of now indef-blocked socks dating back to 2006. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 03:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: All of this Conk 9' images have subsequently been deleted from commons, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Conk 9 and socks --GrapedApe (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:500EMain.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:500EMain.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is part of a series of hundreds of likely copyvios uploaded by a series of now indef-blocked socks dating back to 2006. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 03:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: All of this Conk 9' images have subsequently been deleted from commons, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Conk 9 and socks --GrapedApe (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Verradomainstreet.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Verradomainstreet.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is part of a series of hundreds of likely copyvios uploaded by a series of now indef-blocked socks dating back to 2006. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 03:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: All of this Conk 9' images have subsequently been deleted from commons, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Conk 9 and socks --GrapedApe (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:PortsmouthRen.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:PortsmouthRen.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is part of a series of hundreds of likely copyvios uploaded by a series of now indef-blocked socks dating back to 2006. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 03:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Do you have any evidence that the uploader has falsified EXIF? It says that the photo was taken on the same day as it was uploaded, so there is probably little time to steal it from somewhere. Also, if this was taken by the uploader, then it could suggest that other photos taken using the same camera model also are fine. Photo taken 2010-10-31T06:50:05 and uploaded 2010-10-31T23:54:29. The time of photography might not be given in the same time zone as the time of upload. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:18, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Honestly, there probably are some legitimate images sprinkled throughout his uploads, but based on a sustained history of copyvios (see here and here for a flavor), plus the use of at least 2 socks, none of them can be trusted. I did try to ferret out possible legit images at Wikipedia talk:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9, but I wasn't able to make any pattern that made sense. WP:AGF is out the window here, and we should Assume Bad Faith.--GrapedApe (talk) 05:30, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - OK. The image is of rather bad quality anyway, so let's not bother too much about it. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:30, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: All of this Conk 9' images have subsequently been deleted from commons, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Conk 9 and socks --GrapedApe (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:NorfolkSouthernTower.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:NorfolkSouthernTower.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is part of a series of hundreds of likely copyvios uploaded by a series of now indef-blocked socks dating back to 2006. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 03:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: All of this Conk 9' images have subsequently been deleted from commons, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Conk 9 and socks --GrapedApe (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:DowntownNorfolk1.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:DowntownNorfolk1.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Includes derivative works: File:DowntownNorfolkLabels.jpg and File:DowntownNorfolk.JPG and File:DowntownNorfolk2.jpg
Image is part of a series of hundreds of likely copyvios uploaded by a series of now indef-blocked socks dating back to 2006. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 03:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: All of this Conk 9' images have subsequently been deleted from commons, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Conk 9 and socks --GrapedApe (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:HamptonCityHall.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:HamptonCityHall.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is part of a series of hundreds of likely copyvios uploaded by a series of now indef-blocked socks dating back to 2006. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 03:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: All of this Conk 9' images have subsequently been deleted from commons, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Conk 9 and socks --GrapedApe (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Southside7.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Southside7.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is part of a series of hundreds of likely copyvios uploaded by a series of now indef-blocked socks dating back to 2006. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 03:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: All of this Conk 9' images have subsequently been deleted from commons, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Conk 9 and socks --GrapedApe (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:OneMellon.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:OneMellon.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is part of a series of hundreds of likely copyvios uploaded by a series of now indef-blocked socks dating back to 2006. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 03:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: All of this Conk 9' images have subsequently been deleted from commons, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Conk 9 and socks --GrapedApe (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:DominionTowerNorfolk.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:DominionTowerNorfolk.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is part of a series of hundreds of likely copyvios uploaded by a series of now indef-blocked socks dating back to 2006. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 03:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: All of this Conk 9' images have subsequently been deleted from commons, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Conk 9 and socks --GrapedApe (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:WestinVABeach.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:WestinVABeach.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is part of a series of hundreds of likely copyvios uploaded by a series of now indef-blocked socks dating back to 2006. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 03:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: All of this Conk 9' images have subsequently been deleted from commons, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Conk 9 and socks --GrapedApe (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MellonSquare.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:MellonSquare.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is part of a series of hundreds of likely copyvios uploaded by a series of now indef-blocked socks dating back to 2006. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 03:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: All of this Conk 9' images have subsequently been deleted from commons, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Conk 9 and socks --GrapedApe (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:555EastMainStreet.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:555EastMainStreet.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is part of a series of hundreds of likely copyvios uploaded by a series of now indef-blocked socks dating back to 2006. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 03:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: All of this Conk 9' images have subsequently been deleted from commons, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Conk 9 and socks --GrapedApe (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MellonSquareStairs.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:MellonSquareStairs.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is part of a series of hundreds of likely copyvios uploaded by a series of now indef-blocked socks dating back to 2006. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 03:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: All of this Conk 9' images have subsequently been deleted from commons, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Conk 9 and socks --GrapedApe (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MarriottNorfolk.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:MarriottNorfolk.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is part of a series of hundreds of likely copyvios uploaded by a series of now indef-blocked socks dating back to 2006. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 03:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: All of this Conk 9' images have subsequently been deleted from commons, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Conk 9 and socks --GrapedApe (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:DowntownHampton2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:DowntownHampton2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is part of a series of hundreds of likely copyvios uploaded by a series of now indef-blocked socks dating back to 2006. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 03:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: All of this Conk 9' images have subsequently been deleted from commons, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Conk 9 and socks --GrapedApe (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ssslopes.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ssslopes.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is part of a series of hundreds of likely copyvios uploaded by a series of now indef-blocked socks dating back to 2006. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 03:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: All of this Conk 9' images have subsequently been deleted from commons, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Conk 9 and socks --GrapedApe (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:VirginiaBeachTownCenterSkyline.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:VirginiaBeachTownCenterSkyline.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is part of a series of hundreds of likely copyvios uploaded by a series of now indef-blocked socks dating back to 2006. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 03:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: All of this Conk 9' images have subsequently been deleted from commons, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Conk 9 and socks --GrapedApe (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:FrickBuilding.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:FrickBuilding.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is part of a series of hundreds of likely copyvios uploaded by a series of now indef-blocked socks dating back to 2006. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 03:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: All of this Conk 9' images have subsequently been deleted from commons, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Conk 9 and socks --GrapedApe (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:OldPortsmouth1.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:OldPortsmouth1.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is part of a series of hundreds of likely copyvios uploaded by a series of now indef-blocked socks dating back to 2006. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 03:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: All of this Conk 9' images have subsequently been deleted from commons, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Conk 9 and socks --GrapedApe (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:QuantumI.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:QuantumI.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is part of a series of hundreds of likely copyvios uploaded by a series of now indef-blocked socks dating back to 2006. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 03:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: All of this Conk 9' images have subsequently been deleted from commons, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Conk 9 and socks --GrapedApe (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:WilliamPennHotel.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:WilliamPennHotel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is part of a series of hundreds of likely copyvios uploaded by a series of now indef-blocked socks dating back to 2006. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 03:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: All of this Conk 9' images have subsequently been deleted from commons, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Conk 9 and socks --GrapedApe (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:DomTower2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:DomTower2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is part of a series of hundreds of likely copyvios uploaded by a series of now indef-blocked socks dating back to 2006. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 03:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: All of this Conk 9' images have subsequently been deleted from commons, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Conk 9 and socks --GrapedApe (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Kaufmann'sDowntownPittsburgh.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kaufmann'sDowntownPittsburgh.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is part of a series of hundreds of likely copyvios uploaded by a series of now indef-blocked socks dating back to 2006. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 03:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: All of this Conk 9' images have subsequently been deleted from commons, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Conk 9 and socks --GrapedApe (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MainStreetTower.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:MainStreetTower.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is part of a series of hundreds of likely copyvios uploaded by a series of now indef-blocked socks dating back to 2006. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 03:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: All of this Conk 9' images have subsequently been deleted from commons, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Conk 9 and socks --GrapedApe (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:ArmHoff2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:ArmHoff2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is part of a series of hundreds of likely copyvios uploaded by a series of now indef-blocked socks dating back to 2006. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 03:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: All of this Conk 9' images have subsequently been deleted from commons, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Conk 9 and socks --GrapedApe (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:DomSquare2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:DomSquare2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is part of a series of hundreds of likely copyvios uploaded by a series of now indef-blocked socks dating back to 2006. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 03:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: All of this Conk 9' images have subsequently been deleted from commons, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Conk 9 and socks --GrapedApe (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Verradomainstreetlofts.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Verradomainstreetlofts.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is part of a series of hundreds of likely copyvios uploaded by a series of now indef-blocked socks dating back to 2006. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 03:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: All of this Conk 9' images have subsequently been deleted from commons, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Conk 9 and socks --GrapedApe (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:NorfolkScopeCloseup.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:NorfolkScopeCloseup.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is part of a series of hundreds of likely copyvios uploaded by a series of now indef-blocked socks dating back to 2006. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 03:33, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: All of this Conk 9' images have subsequently been deleted from commons, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Conk 9 and socks --GrapedApe (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:NorfolkVACityHall.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:NorfolkVACityHall.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is part of a series of hundreds of likely copyvios uploaded by a series of now indef-blocked socks dating back to 2006. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 03:33, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: All of this Conk 9' images have subsequently been deleted from commons, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Conk 9 and socks --GrapedApe (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:RichmondVASkyline.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:RichmondVASkyline.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is part of a series of hundreds of likely copyvios uploaded by a series of now indef-blocked socks dating back to 2006. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 03:33, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: All of this Conk 9' images have subsequently been deleted from commons, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Conk 9 and socks --GrapedApe (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:BankofAmericaCenterNorfolk.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:BankofAmericaCenterNorfolk.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is part of a series of hundreds of likely copyvios uploaded by a series of now indef-blocked socks dating back to 2006. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 03:33, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: All of this Conk 9' images have subsequently been deleted from commons, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Conk 9 and socks --GrapedApe (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ssiderowhouses.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ssiderowhouses.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is part of a series of hundreds of likely copyvios uploaded by a series of now indef-blocked socks dating back to 2006. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9 GrapedApe (talk) 03:42, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: All of this Conk 9' images have subsequently been deleted from commons, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Conk 9 and socks --GrapedApe (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Lessie in Wuxi County.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lessie in Wuxi County.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Watermarked image not likely taken by the uploader as claimed. Eeekster (talk) 22:04, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, do you mean I will ask the author who even don't know how to speak English a bit to talk to you? This is my hometown, I am a foreign student here in Manila, Philippines, I know how to speak English well and can read Chinese well..kongshengxin (talk) 22:10, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- Bnncff--You'd need to verify the author's release via WP:OTRS.--GrapedApe (talk) 22:45, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - I have also explained that to Bnncff on my user talk page. Still, this image is out of scope and should be deleted. De728631 (talk) 19:05, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Out of scope, as unused personal image.--GrapedApe (talk) 22:45, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Wuxi Prairie.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wuxi Prairie.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Appears to be taken from cqwuxi.cn and not likely to be the property of the uploader as claimed. Exif's "CREATOR: gd-jpeg v1.0 (using IJG JPEG v62)," is most likely from a php script. Eeekster (talk) 22:31, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- No, it's not his own work, license verification pending. See my user talk page. De728631 (talk) 19:07, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.